SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



JUDGMENT

Abdul Aziz Mohamad JCA:

[1] This appeal, which we unaminously dismissed, questioned the validity of a citation issued on 29 November 2000 under O. 72 r. 7 of the Rules of the High Court 1980. The state of affairs and the events that necessitated and led up to the issue of the citation are set out in the grounds of judgment of my learned brother, Zulkefli Makinudin JCA, with which my learned brother, James Foong JCA, associates himself.

The Need To Enter A Caveat

[2] Although the question about the need to enter a caveat was raised in the appellant's Skeletal Submission, it was raised merely as a point of appeal, that is, it was not argued, and in his oral submission in the appeal the appellant's counsel did not submit on the question, except to answer a question on the subject from my learned brother James Foong JCA at the close of the submissions. I therefore believed that the appellant was no longer pursuing the question and that it did not need to be decided. But since Zulkefli Makinudin JCA has dealt with the question, I will simply say that I, too, am of opinion, and for the reasons given by my learned brother, that there is no requirement in the Rules for the entry o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top