SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



JUDGMENT

Gopal Sri Ram JCA:

[1] This is the judgment of the court.

[2] This is an appeal directed against the order of the High Court Johor Bahru convicting the appellant of an offence of possession under s. 39A(2) of the Dangerous Drugs Act 1952 ("the Act') and sentencing him to a period of 16 years imprisonment and the statutory minimum of ten strokes of the rattan. The accused was originally charged for the offence of trafficking under s. 39B of the Act. At the close of the prosecution's case the learned trial judge amended the charge to one under s. 39A(2) of the Act and called on the appellant to make his defence to the amended charge. The appellant gave evidence and at the close of the whole case was found guilty and convicted and the orders already adverted to were passed upon him.

[3] The appellant has appealed against sentence only. Learned counsel appearing for him argued that the sentence is manifestly excessive taking into account the totality of the facts and circumstances of this case.

[4] Now, the quantity of drugs involved in this case is 379.36 grammes of cannabis. This, as pointed out by the learned deputy, is 7 1/2 times the statutory trigger prescribed by s. 39A

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top