SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



JUDGMENT

(1) This is my judgment in respect of the notice of motion (enclosure 63) by Bina Puri Sdn Bhd to remove the liquidator. The prayers inter alia read as follows:

"(a) The private liquidator. Mr Jambulingam Sethuraman Raki C/O Rimbun Corporate Advisory Sdn Bhd to be replaced by Mr Wong Weng Foo C/O Messrs Wong Weng Foo & Co;

(b) Costs in cause, and

(c) Any orders or reliefs which this Honourable Court deems fit and proper in this Motion."

(2) The parties have relied on the following cases: Asia Commercial Finance (M) Bhd v. Kawal Teliti Sdn Bhd (1995) 3 CLJ 783; Chee Pok Choy & Ors v. Scotch Leasing Sdn Bhd (2001) 2 CLJ 321; re Builded Ltd Quickson (South and West) Ltd v. Katz and another (2004) All ER (D) 138; Ng Yok Gee & Anor v. CTI Leather Sdn Bhd; Metro Brilliant Sdn Bhd & Ors (Interveners) (2006) 3 CLJ 360; Ajit Kumar Nag v. G.M. (P.J.) Indian Oil Corporation Ltd Halsia & Ors (2005) RD-Standing Committee 491; Dato Seri Anwar Ibrahim v. PP (2010) 8 CLJ 934; T.R Hamzah & Yeang Sdn Bhd v. City Centre Sdn Bhd (Commercial Division Suit No: D6-28-9-2000); SBP Builders Sdn Bhd v. Bennes Engineering Sdn Bhd Procam (Pte) Ltd v. Charles Jocelyn Tichborne Nangle & Anor (199

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top