SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



JUDGMENT

Vernon Ong Lam Kiat JCA:

Introduction

[1] This appeal stems from the decision of the High Court ordering the defendant to pay to the plaintiff the sum of RM283,500.00 being adjustment for iron (Fe) content, RM54,432,00 being adjustment for moisture content and RM3,227.00 being the defendant's portion of the charges for obtaining the analysis report in respect of iron ore supplied by the defendant.

[2] On 27 January 2015, we heard submission of counsel for the parties. After perusing the written submissions and record of appeal, we allowed the defendant's appeal with costs. The grounds of our decision are as follows. For convenience, the parties shall be referred to as they were in the Court below.

Brief Account Of The Salient Facts

[3] Pursuant to a written agreement for the sale and purchase of iron ore dated 28 february 2012 ("the Contract"), the defendant agreed to sell and the plaintiff agreed to buy 10,000 MT (+/10% at buyer's option) of iron ore 0-50mm FE 54% at the price of RM140.00 per wet metric ton (WMT) Ex-Seller Mining Site.

[4] At the plaintiff's request, the defendant sent the iron ore shipment to the Malacca Port to be loaded onto the vessel MV Christi


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top