SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



JUDGMENT

Nallini Pathmanathan JCA:

Introduction

[1] These two appeals arise from the decision of the High Court dated 29 January 2016 allowing the claim brought by the plaintiff, Pantai Towers Management Corporation ('the management corporation') and the respondent here, against the two defendants, namely Brightvite Sdn Bhd, the 1st defendant ('Brightvite') who is the appellant in appeal number 433 and Benchmark Link Sdn Bhd, the 2nd defendant who is the appellant in appeal number 434.

[2] The management corporation's claim vide originating summons against Brightvite and Benchmark (in each of the appeals) is for service charges, maintenance fees, quit rent, insurance premium payment and water charges ('management fees') in respect of condominium units purchased by the appellants from the previous owner, one Metroplex Berhad (in liquidation) ('Metroplex'). The two appeals, namely 433 and 434 were heard together.

[3] The learned High Court Judge determined the matter in favour of the management corporation ruling that Brightvite and Benchmark were liable for the full management fees due and owing. This sum included arrears of management fees that had accrued due prior to their acquisition

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top