JUDGMENT

Hamid Sultan Abu Backer JCA:

[1] The appellant (employee) appeals against the decision of the High Court which had quashed the decision of the Industrial Court.

[2] The central argument before the High Court as well as the Industrial Court was related to the jurisprudence of 'termination simpliciter'. The Memorandum of Appeal reads as follows:

"1. The learned Judicial Commissioner erred in law and/or in fact in finding that the Industrial Court had acted irrationally and/or unreasonably in a Wednesbury sense and/or illegally and/or with procedural impropriety in arriving at its decision.

2. The learned Judicial Commissioner erred in law and/or in fact when His Lordship disturbed and/or interfered with the Industrial Court's findings of law and/or fact which found that the respondent had unlawfully terminated the appellant's employment.

3. The learned Judicial Commissioner erred in law and/or in fact when His Lordship disturbed and/or interfered with the Industrial Court's findings of law and/or fact which found that there was termination simpliciter.

4. The learned Judicial Commissioner erred in law and/or in fact by failing to find, or failing to uphold the Industrial