JUDGMENT
Introduction
[1] The appellants claimed for compensation from the Advocates and Solicitors Compensation Fund ("Compensation Fund") established under the
[2] The High Court found that the appellants' appeal had no merit and that the respondent had acted within its powers under
[3] The appellants appealed that decision to this Court. We allowed the appeal for the following reasons.
Background Facts
[4] The appellants and their two other siblings had beneficial interest in their parents' house in Ipoh ("Property"). The Property was sold to Kawan Properties Sdn Bhd at the sale price of RM2,524,410.00.
[5] Shan a/l Theivanthiran ("Shan") who at the material time was an advocate and solicitor practicing as a partner in the firm of Messrs Thevin Chandran & Associates acted for the ap
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.