SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



JUDGMENT

N.H. Chan J:

The plaintiff is a private company. The defendant, which is now under receivership, is a co-operative society registered under the Co-operative Societies Act 1948 . The name is misleading; it is not a bank at all.

On 7 April 1986, a member of the defendant co-operative society, who was also a director of the plaintiff company, took a loan of 20 million from the defendant co-operative society. The loan was secured by a charge on the plaintiff company's lands in favour of the defendant co-operative society as chargee.

The plaintiff's application before me is based purely on law. It asks for a declaration that the third party charge which was created by the plaintiff company in favour of the defendant co-operative society is void and unenforceable for contravening the prohibitions in s.133 of the Companies Act 1965. S.133 , inter alia, prohibits a company from entering into a guarantee or providing any security in connection with a loan made to its director by any other person.

Before I proceed to consider the effect of s.133 of the Companies Act , I find that it is necessary to make an examination of the position of the equivalent or similar provisions in the Com

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top