JUDGMENT
Lau Bee Lan J:
[1]
Vide
(a) the summons is:
(i) scandalous, frivolous and vexatious; or
(ii) an abuse of the process of the Court; and
(b) that by virtue of item 92 of the Ordinance, the plaintiffs' cause of action had become statute barred on 29 November 1999.
[2] The 1st defendant's application is supported by the affidavits of Winnie Wong Nai San affirmed on 5 March 2004 and affidavit in reply of Desmond Anura Sahathevan affirmed on 13 April 2004 and opposed by the affidavit of Addy Termizi bin Mohammed Tuah affirmed on 31 March 2004.
[3] The plaintiffs' claim arose out of an alleged collision which occurred between a motorcycle No. KS 2536Q ridden by the 1st plaintiff
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.