SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



JUDGMENT

Mohd Hishamudin Mohd Yunus J:

[1] The trial of this case is scheduled to be held on 1, 2, 3 and 4 December 2008. The defendant has applied to this Court for subpoenas to be issued to the following persons to be witnesses for the defence at the trial. They are:

(a) Tan Sri William Cheng Heng Jem;

(b) Encik Cheng Yong Liang; and

(c) Encik Charoen Sae Tang.

[2] The subpoena's have been issued and served on the above three persons (hereinafter shall be referred to as the 'Applicants').

[3] The plaintiff and the above three Applicants now, by summons in chambers at encls 27, 31 and 39, apply to this Court to set aside the subpoenas.

[4] There is also an alternative prayer that the applicants be permitted to give their evidence only after the defendant's principal witness has given evidence.

[5] In their statement of claim, the plaintiff claims against the defendant a sum of RM500,000, which the plaintiff had lent to the defendant.

[6] Tan Sri William Cheng is not a director, officer or shareholder of the plaintiff Company. However, it is not disputed that the plaintiff Company is directly or indirectly controlled by Tan Sri William Cheng and his family members.

[7] It is n

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top