JUDGMENT
[1] The trial of this case is scheduled to be held on 1, 2, 3 and 4 December 2008. The defendant has applied to this Court for subpoenas to be issued to the following persons to be witnesses for the defence at the trial. They are:
(a) Tan Sri William Cheng Heng Jem;
(b) Encik Cheng Yong Liang; and
(c) Encik Charoen Sae Tang.
[2] The subpoena's have been issued and served on the above three persons (hereinafter shall be referred to as the 'Applicants').
[3] The plaintiff and the above three Applicants now, by summons in chambers at encls 27, 31 and 39, apply to this Court to set aside the subpoenas.
[4] There is also an alternative prayer that the applicants be permitted to give their evidence only after the defendant's principal witness has given evidence.
[5] In their statement of claim, the plaintiff claims against the defendant a sum of RM500,000, which the plaintiff had lent to the defendant.
[6] Tan Sri William Cheng is not a director, officer or shareholder of the plaintiff Company. However, it is not disputed that the plaintiff Company is directly or indirectly controlled by Tan Sri William Cheng and his family members.
[7] It is n
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.