SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



JUDGMENT

Preliminary:

When these cases were fast tracked and came before me for case management, counsel for Hubah Sdn Bhd, Konkamaju Sdn Bhd, Konkajadi Sdn Bhd and Aggasf Properties Sdn Bhd, Mr Ronny Cham informed the court that these cases could be dealt with without the need for oral evidence to be called and was willing to accept the facts as put forth by the opposing sides which are represented by three set of lawyers. Mr Cham's proposal was not accepted by opposing counsel; hence I was required to hear submissions as to whether I should order an Order 14A trial. After hearing submissions from respective counsel, I concur with Mr Cham's proposal except for the issue of Limitation raised by him. That in short is the preliminary.

Proceeding:

These cases in substance concern various agreements and powers of attorney executed between the litigants. Koperasi Pusaka (Penampang) Berhad (RCS 219/72) (formerly known as Syarikat Kerjasama Batu-Batu Jayadiri (Moyog) Berhad) ("Koperasi"), who wears the hat of the plaintiff in two of the cases and the hat of the defendant in the other four cases, is now coming to court to set aside the various agreements and powers of attorney on the ground t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top