SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



JUDGMENT

Abdul Aziz Abdul Rahim J:

[Enclosure 1]

[1] Enclosure 1 is allowed. Order In Terms of prayer (b), (c), (d) and (f) and in respect of prayer (d) there shall be liberty to apply. No order is made in respect of prayer (a) and (e).

[2] Enclosure 8 is allowed and therefore encl 6 is stayed.

[3] Enclosure 3 is struck off because it has become academic.

[4] In this case, the Plaintiff has applied for injunction to prevent the Defendant from evicting the Plaintiff from the tenanted demised premises, Pursuant to a Lease Agreement dated 28 October 1993 (Exhibit AO-1) between the Plaintiff and the Defendant, the Plaintiff has agreed to take up the tenancy of the demised premises for 15 years with an option for renewal for another 15 years subject to rentals and terms and conditions to be agreed.

[5] The original lease is to expire on 18 August 2010. One year before the due expiry date the Defendant has given notice to the Plaintiff to renew the lease/tenancy as in Exhibit AO-3 pursuant to cl 14.1 of the Lease Agreement. The parties entered into negotiation with the Plaintiff seeking the renewal for the whole of the demised premises which included the sub- tenanted lots. However, the Defenda

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top