SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



JUDGMENT

Mary Lim Thiam Suan J:

Introduction

[1] These four applications are heard together. Two of them, Originating Summons No: 24C-15-04-2015 and Originating Summons No: 24C-11-04- 2015 concern an adjudication decision made by IR Leon Weng Seng on 6 April 2015. The other two Originating Summons Nos: 24C-16-05-2015 and 24C-9-04-2015 concern an adjudication decision made by Murelidaran M Navaratnam on 30 March 2015.

[2] All four originating summons were heard together. It makes every good sense since these cases concern the same primary parties who had entered into two separate yet related contracts. The disputes that arose between them went to two separate adjudications, both of which are under challenge. Ranhill E&C Sdn Bhd ("Ranhill"), the successful party, is seeking to enforce both decisions under s 28 of the Construction Industry Payment and Adjudication Act 2012 ("CIPAA 2012") while Tioxide (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd ("Tioxide") is seeking to set aside both decisions under s 15 of the same Act.

[3] There are many common grounds relied on both parties in respect of all four cases. All four cases were heard together with written and oral submissions made by all counsel. The part

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top