SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



JUDGMENT

Quay Chew Soon J:

Introduction

[1] The plaintiff's action against the defendants is for unlawful detention and malicious prosecution. After a full trial, I allowed the plaintiff's claim for unlawful detention but dismissed his claim for malicious prosecution. Here are the grounds of my judgment.

Trial

[2] The witnesses who testified at the trial were:

The Defendants

[3] The 1st defendant was a senior police officer with the rank of Assistant Superintendent of Police (ASP) at the material time. He served as an Investigating Officer in the Criminal Investigation Unit, Criminal Investigation Department, Royal Malaysian Police Headquarters, Bukit Aman, Kuala Lumpur.

[4] The 2nd defendant was a senior police officer with the rank of Assistant Superintendent of Police (ASP) at the material time. He served as an Investigating Officer at the Criminal Investigation Unit, Criminal Investigation Department, Royal Malaysian Police Headquarters, Bukit Aman, Kuala Lumpur.

[5] The 3rd defendant was a police officer with the rank of Police Superintendent at the material time. He served as the Deputy Chief at the Dang Wangi District Police Headquarters, Jalan Dang Wangi, Kuala L


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top