SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



JUDGMENT

Mahammad Ibrahim J:

Facts Of The Case

[1] Both appellants, prior to their marriage and up to the time of the filing of this application, were residing in Malacca at an address known as No 1, Jalan TTP2, Taman Tambak Paya Permai, 75460 Air Molek, Melaka.

[2] They have decided to get married in the Federal Territory of Kuala Lumpur as the first applicant was then a married man and was intent not to let the news of the marriage reaching his first wife. Upon the evidence adduced, the first applicant was a man of means financially and physically, being a contractor earning an income of some RM9,000 a month.

[3] The second applicant has never married before. On 16 September 2000, between 10:00 am and 11:00 am, the parties were married at a double-storey shop house in the Federal Territory, Kuala Lumpur. A week later, they received their Certificate of Marriage, since marked as exh P1. At the said shop house, a jurunikah and two witnesses, not personally known to the applicants but whose character and personality did not appear to be questionable to the applicants, were made available for the solemnization.

[4] The marriage was solemnized upon a maskahwin of RM80 in cash, and the appli

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top