SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



JUDGMENT

Lee Heng Cheong J:

Background

[1] The respondent was charged with two offences under s 17(b) Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission Act 2009 (Act 694) ("MACC Act 2009") and punishable under s 24(1) of the same Act. The respondent was discharged and acquitted by the learned Sessions Court Judge, of both offences at the close of the prosecution's case as the learned Sessions Court Judge ruled that a prima facie case was not made out.

[2] The 2 charges preferred against the respondent are set out below:

The first Charge

"That you, on 18th June 2017, at about 0630 hrs, on the vessel named One United 15, at position 04 degree 13.470 minutes North, 113 degree 03.739 minutes East, in Malaysian Water, did corruptly give gratification of RM 1,500.00 to an agent of the Government of Malaysia, to wit, Mohd Zahir Bin Mohamad Basri, Maritime Lieutenant attached to the Malaysian Maritime Enforcement Agency, Miri District 13,as an inducement forbearing to do an act in relation to your principals affairs, to wit, is to forbear from taking legal action against you, who allegedly has committed an offence under s 8(a) of the Fisheries Act 1985(Act 317), and that you have thereby committed an offence

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top