IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL
MUMBAI BENCH-IV
CP (IB) No. 3050/MB-IV/2019
Under Section 7 of the I&B Code, 2016
In the matter of:
Shri. Vasant Seena Poojary
…Financial Creditor/Applicant
V/s
M/s. Temple Rose Real Estate Private
Limited,
[CIN: U70102MH2007PTC169257]
...Corporate Debtor/Respondent
Order Dated: 09.02.2023
Coram:
Mr. Manoj Kumar Dubey
Mr. Kishore Vemulapalli
Hon’ble Member (Technical)
Hon’ble Member (Judicial)
Appearances (via videoconferencing):
For the Petitioner(s) : Ms. Precilla D’souza, Advocate.
For the Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Prakhar Tandon, Advocate.
ORDER
Per: Kishore Vemulapalli, Member (Judicial)
1.
This is a Company Petition being C.P. (IB) No. 3050/NCLT/MB/C-
IV/2019 filed by Shri Vasant Seena Poojary, the Financial Creditor, on
16.08.2019 under section 7 of Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (I &
B Code) against M/s. Temple Rose Real Estate Private Limited,
Corporate Debtor, for initiating Corporate Insolvency Resolution
IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNALMUMBAI BENCH-IV
CP (IB) No. 3050/MB-IV/2019
_________________________________________________________________________________
Page 2 of 9
Process (CIRP). The Financial Creditor claiming a sum of
Rs.10,29,881/- is outstanding.
2.
The case of the Financial Creditor is as under.
a.
The Corporate Debtor is a Private Limited Company
incorporated under Companies Act, 1956 and is engaged in the business
of acquiring land and developing into Mini Township in Natural
Ambience
with
Urban
lifestyle
facilities
and
constructing
Bungalows/Villas with modern amenities.
b.
The Corporate Debtor liability arises in connection with the
certain financial investment in the Ponzi Schemes introduced by the
Corporate Debtor to the Financial Creditor where the Financial
Creditor is an individual investor of the Corporate Debtor.
c.
The Corporate Debtor for the purpose of development floated
various schemes for the sale of acquired land and among them also
introduced various Cash Incentive Schemes (CIS). The investors
invested/deposited various sums of money as per the schemes
introduced by the Corporate Debtor. The Corporate Debtor had
obtained credit rating from CRISIL and also ISO Certification which
showed the credibility, and stability of the company. More than 6000
Investors/Depositors had invested in the various schemes of the
company. The Cash Incentive Schemes of the Corporate Debtor were
reproduced hereinunder: -
i.
Income Growth Plan (IGP);
ii.
Monthly Income Plan (MIP)
iii.
Buy back scheme(s)
iv.
Guaranteed Buyback Scheme 3 to 5 years period scheme:
v.
Guaranteed Buyback Scheme 3 to 3 ½ years period scheme:
vi.
Revenue Sharing
IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNALMUMBAI BENCH-IV
CP (IB) No. 3050/MB-IV/2019
_________________________________________________________________________________
Page 3 of 9
vii.
Unit Certificate
viii.
Equal Monthly Instalment Scheme
ix.
Bungalow Scheme
x.
Agro Farm Scheme
xi.
Unique offer 10 plots
xii.
Personal Loan
d.
The Financial Creditor invested total amount of Rs. 4,50,000/-
on different dates under 3 years Guaranteed Buy Back Scheme which
doubles the amount after the period of 3 years. The Financial Creditor
also invested Rs. 66,215/- in Equal Monthly Instalments (EMI)
Scheme by making the 20% down payment of the proposed N.A land
opted to purchase by paying in future 60 Equated Monthly Instalments
to the Corporate Debtor. The Notarised Sale Agreement between
Corporate Debtor and Financial Creditor had been executed for the
piece of land/plot which was given as security which is detailed as infra:
i.
Invested full payment an amount of Rs. 1,50,000/-
(Rupees One Lakh Fifty Thousand only) vide Agreement
dated 5th May 2015 with the Corporate Debtor under
Receipt 02461 dated 18th April 2015 in the proposed N.A
project Rose Raigad City- 1, location W
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.