CA/55/KOB/2020
Page 1 of 19
IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL
KOCHI BENCH
CA/55/KOB/2020
(Under Section 59 of Companies Act, 2013 read with Rule 70 of NCLT Rules, 2016)
Date of Order: 23 June 2022
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Ashok Kumar Borah, Member (Judicial)
Hon’ble Mr. Anil Kumar. B, Member (Technical)
Muraleedhara Kurup,
16-A, Artech City, Meenakshi,
Vazhuthacaud, Oppo-Trivandrum Club,
Sasthamangalam P.O., Thiruvananthapuram,
Kerala- 695 010. …Appellant.
Versus
1. M/s SarDe Traffic Infra Private Limited,
(CIN: U74999KL2017PTC048480),
Pulinkala Veedu Pappalakilimanoor,
Thiruvananthapuram,
Kerala- 695 601.
2. Mr. Haneefa Niyazi,
647, Pulinkala House, Pappala,
Pazhayakunnummel, Kilimanoor P.O.,
Thiruvananthapuram,
Kerala- 695 601. … Respondents.
Parties/Counsel present (through video conference):-
For the Appellant
: Shri. Bijoy P. Pulipra, Advocate.
For the Respondents : Shri. Sandeep Gopalakrishnan,
Smt. Jinnu Sara George,
Shri. Anand Vimal,
Smt. Anju Davis K., Advocates.
CA/55/KOB/2020
Page 2 of 19
ORDER
Per: Ashok Kumar Borah, Member (J)
The present Company Appeal No. CA/55/KOB/2020 has been filed
under Section 59 of the Companies Act, 2013, by the Appellant against
M/s. SarDe Traffic Infra Private Limited and another seeking the following
reliefs:
i. To include the name of the Appellant in the Register of Members of the
1st Respondent Company by rectifying the Register of Members of the
Company.
ii. To enable the Appellant to exercise his voting rights on all the
decisions taken by the shareholders at the general meetings and annual
general meetings.
2. The brief facts of the case are as under: -
3. The 1st Respondent Company is incorporated on 07.03.2017 as per the
Certificate of Incorporation issued by the Registrar of Companies, Kerala,
vide U74999KIL2017PTC048480. The Registered Office of the company is
situated at Pulinkala Veedu, Pappala, Kilimanoor, Thiruvananthapuram,
Kerala 695 601. The main object of incorporating the 1st Company, as per
the Memorandum of Association is to develop, install and manage traffic
infrastructure, road safety solutions and associated civil solutions, to act as
consultants, manufacturers, contractors, dealers, and suppliers of traffic
infrastructure and road safety equipment and to conduct studies, survey
and research in road safety and traffic-related areas.
4. The Appellant stated that the 2nd Respondent joined the partnership firm
under the name and style “____”as an Accountant on 1st August 2015 and
CA/55/KOB/2020
Page 3 of 19
served as such till December 2018. However, from 7th March 2017, the 2nd
Respondent was involved in the management of accounts of the firm as well
as the affairs of the 1st Respondent Company. Subsequently as a part of
expansion of the business operations and to develop the marketing and
sales, the Appellant and the 2nd Respondent along with one Mr. P R Datsun
had decided to form the 1st Respondent Company with a Paid-up capital of
Rs 1,00,00,000/- (Rupees One Crore Only) divided into 1,00,000/- (One
lakh) equity shares of Rs 100/- (Rupees Hundred Only) each. Based on the
said decision the 2nd Respondent and the Appellant had formed the 1st
Respondent Company on 7th March, 2017 as a private limited company.
The 2nd Respondent is the "officer in default" with respect to the
management of the 1st Respondent Company and has entrusted with
substantial powers of the management of the 1st Respondent Company.
5. It is further stated that as a part of the new business arrangement, the
Appellant h