IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF SRI LANKA
M. T. Mohammed Laffar, S. U. B. Karalliyadde, JJ
Thotagama Liyana Arachchige Viranji Aparna – Appellant
Versus
University Grants Commission and Others – Respondent
S.U.B. Karalliyadde, J.
The Petitioner is employed as a Management Assistant (Grade I) at the University of Visual and Performing Arts of Sri Lanka. She preferred an application on 02.11.2017 marked as P4 for a post of Assistant Secretary/Assistant Registrar consequent to an internal notice dated 13.10.2017 marked as P3, calling for applications from the qualified internal applicants to fill the vacancies of Assistant Secretary/Assistant Registrar of the 1st Respondent, the University Grant Commission (the UGC). The Petitioner was called for a written examination and scored 161 marks. By the letter dated 13.06.2018 marked as P6, the Secretary of the UGC (the 9th Respondent) informed the Petitioner that she has been successful in the written examination and requested her to submit the duly filled information sheet marked as P7 sent along with P6. She submitted the duly filled information sheet. Thereafter, by the letter dated 06.07.2018 issued by the 9th Respondent marked as P9, the Petitioner was called for an Interview. With that letter, the marking scheme which the Interview panel will use at the Structured Interview marked as P10 was attached. According to the said marking scheme
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.