SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1948 Supreme(SRI)(SC) 14

Geeris Appu v Seydeen


287

1948 Present; Howard C.J.

GEERIS APPU, Appellant, a nd SEYDEEN, P. S. 262.
Respondent

S . C. 253-M. C. Balapitiya, 60,121

Grievous hurt-Incised wound caused by sharp weapon-Piece of bone chipped off-Penal Code, s. 311.

An incised wound cutting into the bone and chipping off a piece of the bone is grievous hurt within the meaning of section 311 of the Penal Code.

A PPEAL from a judgment of the Magistrate, Balapitiya.

K. C. de Silva,
for accused appellant.

Arthur Keuneman, Grown Counsel, for the Attorney-General.

May 3, 1948. HOWARD C.J .-

In this case it has been contended that the injury inflicted by the appellant on the complainant did not amount in law to grevious hurt and I have been referred in that connection to the case of Inspector of Police v. Pedrick 1 [ (1944) 45 N. L. R. 62. ] .

288

The head-note of that case is as follows :-

An injury caused to






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top