Samithamby V The Queen
An offender may be said to have been deprived of his power of self-control by
grave and sudden provocation within the meaning of
Exception 1 to section 294 of
the Penal Code even though there was an interval of time between the giving of
the provocation and
the time of the killing, if the evidence shows that, all the
time during the interval, the accused suffered under a loss of self-control.
against a conviction at a trial before the
Supreme Court.
V. E. Selvarajah, with (assigned) B. B. D. Fernando, for the accused-appellant.
E. D. Wikramanayake, Crown Counsel, for the Crown.
Cur. adv. vult.
August 3,1971.'
The accused in this case was convicted of committing the murder of his wife on
13th September, 1969. There was no doubt that the
accused did in fact cause the
death of his wife by a stab injury.
The accused gave evidence in his defence. He and his wife had been married for
about 25 years and there were seven children of that
marriage. A few months
prior to this incident he discovered his wife in an a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.