Ummar v Rambukwella
Present
A trader was charged with selling one and a half pounds of mutton, including J
Ib. of offal (viz., suet). The maximum price fixed
for mutton without bones was
75 cents per pound and the price charged by the trader for the quantity sold was
Re. 1.13.
Held, that the accused had not offended against the Ordinance.
Suet is either mutton or offal. If it be mutton no offence has been committed.
If it be offal, the price of offal has not been controlled.
from a conviction by the Magistrate of Colombo.
for the accused, appellant.
for the complainant, respondent.
January 28, 1943.
The appellant was charged (1) with selling " one and a half pounds of mutton
including 1/4 pound of offal (to wit, suet) "
in contravention of an order dated
September 26, 1942, made under the Control of Prices Ordinance (No. 39 of 1939),
and (2) with
failing to give a receipt in contravention of the said Order. He
was convicted on each charge but appeals against the conviction
and sentence on
the first charge only.
In order to understand the charge, which appears to have
been framed with very little thought, it is
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.