SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1928 Supreme(SRI)(SC) 33

Weerasuriya v Seneviratne


1928
.


Where, at a public auction, at which an Urban District Council put up for competition the lease of certain blocks of land, a member of the Council, with the permission of the Chairman, bid for and obtained a lease on behalf of another person, whose name was given as that of the purchaser,-

, that under the circumstance!! the member was not " concerned in a contract with the Council " within the meaning of section 237 (1) of the Local Government Ordinance.

appellant, a member of the Urban District Council of Matara, was convicted of an offence under section 237 of the Local Government Ordinance, No. 11 of 1920, and sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 20. The section penalizes any member, officer, or servant of the Council " who shall be either directly or indirectly concerned in any contract or work made with or executed for the Council." It appears that the Urban District Council, having resolved to lease certain blocks of land which it owned, put them up for public auction. The sale was carried out by a Sub-Committee consisting of the Chairman, the Vice-Chairman, Mr. W. Gooneratne, and the appellant. For a certain lo
















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top