Weerasuriya v Seneviratne
1928
.
Where, at a public auction, at which an Urban District Council put up for
competition the lease of certain blocks of land, a member
of the Council, with
the permission of the Chairman, bid for and obtained a lease on behalf of
another person, whose name was given
as that of the purchaser,-
, that under the circumstance!! the member was not " concerned in a contract
with the Council " within the meaning of section
237 (1) of the Local Government
Ordinance.
appellant, a member of the Urban District Council of Matara, was convicted
of an offence under section 237 of the Local Government
Ordinance, No. 11 of
1920, and sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 20. The section penalizes any member,
officer, or servant of the
Council " who shall be either directly or indirectly
concerned in any contract or work made with or executed for the Council."
It
appears that the Urban District Council, having resolved to lease certain blocks
of land which it owned, put them up for public
auction. The sale was carried out
by a Sub-Committee consisting of the Chairman, the Vice-Chairman, Mr. W. Gooneratne, and the appellant.
For a certain lo
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.