Wijesinghe v Incorporated Council of Legal Education
Appellant, and
Respondent
When a Corporation is represented by a proctor, a plaint filed on behalf of the
Corporation would be sufficiently signed as required
by section 470 of the Civil
Procedure Code if it is signed only by the proctor; the plaint need not be
subscribed by anyone else
on behalf of the Corporation.
Once the Court accepts and acts on a proxy filed in favour of a proctor,
presumably because no defect appears on the face of the
proxy, any party who
desires to question the authority of that proctor has the onus of showing the
want of authority. Accordingly,
once the Court accepts and acts on a proxy given
to a proctor by the Incorporated Council of Legal Education, when it is
plaintiff
in an action, the Court is entitled to assume, in the absence of
evidence led to the contrary by the defendant, that the common
seal of the
Council was affixed to the proxy after due compliance with the requirements of
Rule 4 of the Second Schedule to the
Courts Ordinance. In such a case it cannot
be contended that, under section 68 of the Evidence Ordinance, the plaintiff
must call
at least one of the attesting witnesses to prove
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.