SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(SRI)(SC) 9691

M. Sampath K. B. Wijeratne J.

Background

The Plaintiff–Respondent–Petitioner–Appellant (hereinafter referred to as the Plaintiff–Appellant) instituted this action in the District Court seeking to partition the land known as “Bulugahawatta.” After taking the preliminary steps, including the registration of lis pendens and the service of summons, a commission was issued to Mr. U. R. Edirisinghe, Licensed Surveyor, for the preparation of the preliminary plan. Upon executing the commission, the Commissioner tendered Plan No. 242 (marked ‘X’) together with the corresponding report (marked ‘X1’).

Upon service of summons, the 1st Defendant–Respondent–Respondent Respondent (hereinafter referred to as the 1st Defendant–Respondent) and the 15th to 21st Defendants–Respondents–Respondents–Respondents (hereinafter referred to as the 15th to 21st Defendants–Respondents) appeared in Court and filed their respective statements of claim. On 6th June 1988, the 22nd and 23rd Defendants–Respondents were added as parties to the action, and they thereafter filed their statements of claim.

The 2nd and 3rd Defendants–Respondents–Respondents–Respondents (hereinafter referred to as the 2nd and 3rd DefendantsRe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top