SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(SRI)(SC) 9696

THURAIRAJA, PC, ACTING CJ.

1. The Applicant-Respondent-Respondent, M.D.K. Padmasena (hereinafter the “Respondent”), was employed by the Respondent-Appellant-Appellant, Sri Lanka Transport Board, (hereinafter the “Appellant” or “SLTB”) from 14th March 1981 and was set to retire on the 23rd of October 2011, upon the completion of 55 years of age, which was the compulsory age of retirement at the time.

2. Subsequently, as per SLTB–HR Circular No. 15/2011, Marked “R1” issued by the Appellant Board, the age of retirement was extended up to the age of 57 years.

3. Thereafter, the Appellant issued SLTB–HR Circular No. 03/2013, Marked “A6” which further extended the age of retirement to 60 years. However, such extension was subject to the condition that it would be granted yearly upon requests/applications made 3 months prior to the date of retirement and upon such request/application being approved by the Board of the Appellant.

4. The Respondent, as he approached the age of 57, requested such an extension, duly complying with the above conditions. He was accordingly granted an extension for another year of service from 24th October 2013 to 23rd October 2014 until he turned 58.

5. Finding tha

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top