SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(SRI)(SC) 20704

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF SRI LANKA In the matter of a Rule in terms of Section 42(2) of the Judicature Act No. 02 of 1978 against Mr. Nizam Mohammed Shameem, Attorney-at-Law.

H.M.B.P. Herath, SC Rule No. 6/2021 Secretary, Presidential Commission of Inquiry to Investigate and Inquire into and Report or take Necessary Action on the Bomb Attacks on 21st April 2019, 1st Floor, Block No. 05, Bandaranaike Memorial International Conference Hall, Bauddhaloka Mawatha, Colombo 07.

COMPLAINANT Vs.

Nizam Mohammad Shameem, Attorneys-at-Law, 104 C, Godawaththa Road, Godapitiya, Akuressa.

RESPONDENT Before: Buwaneka Aluwihare PC, J.

Thurairaja PC, J.

Mahinda Samayawardhena, J.

Counsel: Faiz Musthapha PC with N.M. Shaheid PC and M.A. Zaid for the Respondent Attorney-at-Law.

Rohan Sahabandu PC with Chathurika Elvitigala for the Bar Association of Sri Lanka.

Ganaga Wakishta Arachchi DSG for the Attorney General.

Inquiry on: 21.06.2023. Decided on: 24.10.2023.

Aluwihare PC J.

The respondent, who is an Attorney-at-law, has been called upon to show cause as to why he should not be suspended or removed from office on the ground of conduct that would be regarded as disgraceful or

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top