SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(SRI)(CA) 771


IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF SRI LANKA In the matter of an Application for Orders in the nature of Writs of Certiorari, Prohibition and Mandamus under Article 140 of the Constitution of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka.
Superlight Consolidated Pvt Ltd, No. 258/22, Dam Street, Colombo 12 CA (Writ) App. No. 961/2025 PETITIONER Vs.
1. P.I. Udaya, Inquiring Officer, Senior Deputy Director of Customs, Sri Lanka Customs.
2. M.M.M. Mursideen.
Assistant Preventive Officer, Preventive Directorate, Sri Lanka Customs. 3. K.L.D. Malwita, Director of Customs, Preventive Directorate, Sri Lanka Customs.
44. I.U.K.T. Jayawardane, Director of Customs, Central Disposal Directorate, Sri Lanka Customs.
55. Seevali Arukgoda, Director General of Customs, Sri Lanka Customs.
All of;
Sri Lanka Customs, No. 40, Main Street, Colombo 11.
66. Laugfs Salt & Chemicals Ltd, No. 101, Maya Avenue, Colombo 06.
77. Hon. Attorney General, Attorney General’s Department, Colombo 12.
RESPONDENTS Before: S. U. B. Karalliyadde, J Dr. D. F. H. Gunawardhana, J.
Counsel:
Saliya Pieris, P.C. with Geeth Karunaratne, Bojaya Kasun and Dhimarsha Marso for the Petitioner instructed by Dinush Randeniya.
Suren De Silva with Jehan Samarasinghe for the 6th Respondent instructed by JK Chambers Attorneys-at-Law.
A. Jayakody, S.C. for the rest of the Respondents.
Supported on: 07.10.2025 Order delivered on: 10.10.2025 Dr. D. F. H. Gunawardhana, J.

Advocates:
Saliya Pieris, P.C. with Geeth Karunaratne, Bojaya Kasun and Dhimarsha Marso for the Petitioner instructed by Dinush Randeniya.
Suren De Silva with Jehan Samarasinghe for the 6th Respondent instructed by JK Chambers Attorneys-at-Law.

Order

Introduction

The Petitioner is a body corporate duly incorporated under the Companies Act, No. 7 of 2007, which is capable of suing and being sued in its corporate name. Further, the Petitioner claims that he is the local buyer of a certain consignment of salt imported by the 6th Respondent as the consignee. The 1st Respondent is the Senior Deputy Director of Customs, who held an inquiry and delivered an order on 29.09.2025 (P17), and the 2nd Respondent is an Assistant Preventive Officer, attached to the Sri Lanka Customs, who investigated the matter. The 3rd Respondent is the Director of Customs, under whose supervision the investigation was conducted. The 4th Respondent is the Director of Customs, who is authorized to conduct the sales according to the tender (impugned). The 5th Respondent is the Director General of Sri Lanka, appointed in terms of the Customs Ordinance, No. 17 of 1869 (as amended), and the 1st to 3rd Respondents are his subordinates. The 6th Respondent is the consignee of the goods, whilst the 7th Respondent is sued in his representative capacity as Attorney General.

The consignment of certain salt imported by the 6th Respondent (later purchased by the Petitioner) has been seized by the Customs. Several seizure notices have been issued in terms of Section 125 of the Customs Ordinance, the said notices are marked as P13, P14, and P16. After an inquiry, the 1st Respondent has decided to confiscate the entire consignment of salt imported by the 6th Respondent and claimed by the Petitioner, by his order contained in P17. In addition to that, he has decided to confiscate the vessel MV Stella Beauty by the same order in terms of Section 125 of the Customs Ordinance. In the circumstances, the Petitioner challenged the same and sought a Writ of Certiorari to quash the orders contained thereof.

However, thereafter, by letter marked as P18, the two orders made in respect of the cargo and the vessel have been cancelled by the 2nd Respondent and pending inquiry in terms of Section 135 of the Customs Ordinance. The vessel MV Stella Beauty has been released on a guarantee, whilst seizure in respect of the cargo still continues to operate pending the inquiry under Section 135 of the Customs Ordinance. In the meantime, the 1st Respondent has called for tenders to auction the seized cargo.

In those circumstances, the Petitioner has sought, inter alia, the following reliefs from this Court, invoking the writ jurisdiction of this Court:

“(a) Issue notice on the Respondent;

(b) Call for the original case record of the customs Case No. PREV/2025/00266/CCR/002090 before Your Lordships Court;

(c) Grant and issue and interim order staying any further proceedings of customs case no.PREV/2025/00266/CCR/002090 until the final determination of this application;

(d) Grant and issue and interim order restraining the 1st to 5th Respondents and/or any of their subordinate officers from taking steps to auction and/or tender and/or dispose, the consignment morefully described in P19 until the final determination of this application;

(e) Grant and issue interim order directing the 1st to 5th Respondents and/or any of their subordinate officers to release the consignment morefully described in P19 subject to a guarantee provided by the Petitioner subjected to the payment of the relevant duty;

(f) Grant and issue a mandate in the nature of a Writ of Certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 02.09.2025 produced marked P17 delivered under the customs case no.PREV/2025/00266/CCR/002090;

(g) Grant and issue a mandate in the nature of a Writ of Prohibition restraining the 1st to 5th Respondent and/or any of their subordinate officers from taking steps to auction and/or dispose, the consignment morefully described in P19;

(h) Grant and issue a mandate in the nature of Writ of Mandamus compelling 1st to 5th Respondents and/or any of their subordinate officers to release the consignment morefully described in P19 to the Petitioner;

(i) Grant and issue a ma

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top