SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(SRI)(CA) 772

COURT OF APPEAL
Hon. B. Sasi Mahendran J.
AMSK Constructions Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
The Officer in charge Police Station Damana – Respondent


ORDER

B. Sasi Mahendran, J.

The Petitioner filed this revision application praying inter alia to revise the order of the Learned Judge of the Provincial High Court of Eastern, holden in Ampara by order dated 19.07.2024, dismissing the Petitioner’s application that the Petitioner has failed to establish any exceptional circumstances and that the order is illegal, which shocks the conscience of the Court.

The relevant excerpt of the said order is reproduced below for easy reference;

Page 112

“තවද ඉහත කරුණුවලට අමතරව ⷁᮅතිශ ෝධන ශෙත්සමකට අදාලව අධිකරණය විසින් මුලිකව සලකා බැලිය යුතු ⷁᮅධාන තත්වයක් වන සුවිශ ේෂී කරුණු ඉදිරිෙත් වීමක්ද අදාළ ⷁᮅතිශ ෝධන ශෙත්සශමහි ඉදිරිෙත් කර තිශබන කරුණු ශකශරහි අවධානය ශයාමු කිරීශේදී ශෙනී ශනායයි.”

Against the said order, the Petitioner has invoked the revisionary jurisdiction of this Court in terms of Article 138 of the Constitution.

The question that we are faced with is whether this Court can exercise its revisionary jurisdiction in respect of the order of the High Court of the Provinces in the exercise of its revisionary jurisdiction in terms of Article 154P (3) (b) of the Constitution.

Originally, the revisionary jurisdiction was vested with the Court of Appeal under Ar

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top