CENTRE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE (GUARANTEE LTD) AND OTHERS VS. MINISTER OF BUDDHASASANA RELIGIOUS AND CULTURAL AFFAIRS AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT AND HOUSING AND ECONOMIC POLICIES AND IMPLEMENTATION AND OTHERS
CENTRE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE (GUARANTEE LTD) AND OTHERS
Vs.
MINISTER OF BUDDHASASANA, RELIGIOUS AND CULTURAL AFFAIRS, AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
AND HOUSING,
AND ECONOMIC POLICIES AND IMPLEMENTATION AND OTHERS
SUPREME COURT
AMARASEKARA, J.
WlCKREMASINGHE, J.
DE SILVA, J.
SC/FR/109/2021
OCTOBER 25, 2021
Fundamental rights-Amendment of petition-Role of the Attorney
General-Role of the Supreme Court in fundamental rights applications
The petitioners primarily sought to impugn a Cabinet Memorandum whereby the
approval of the Cabinet of Ministers was sought to withdraw all cases in which
legal action is being taken in respect of tamed elephants and to hand over the
animals to their present owners according to the conditions of transfer.
When this application was supported for leave to proceed, the Attorney General
moved court to dismiss the application in limine stating that the Cabinet
decision had been taken before the petitioners filed the application and the
Cabinet of Ministers are not parties to the application.
An amended petition was filed subject to objections. The Attorney General took up
three ob
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.