KULATUNGE AND ANOTHER VS. COMMISSION TO INVESTIGATE ALLEGATIONS OF BRIBERY OR CORRUPTION AND ANOTHER
KULATUNGE AND ANOTHER
Vs.
COMMISSION TO INVESTIGATE ALLEGATIONS OF BRIBERY OR
CORRUPTION AND ANOTHER
COURT OF APPEAL
KARUNARATHNA, J.
GURUSINGHE, J.
CA/HCC/APPEAL/419/2018
HCB COLOMBO 1971/2013
OCTOBER 6, 2021
Code of Criminal Procedure Act, No. 15 of 1979, section 449(1)-Perjury in open
court-Ingredients of the offence-Standard of proof
The appellant was the second defence witness in a bribery case heard before the
High Court. She was convicted and sentenced to one year's
rigorous imprisonment for perjury under section 449(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure Act. The appellant appealed to the Court of Appeal.
Held:
1. The proceedings and punishment under section 449(1) of the
Code of Criminal Procedure Act for perjury requires a high degree of proof that
the witness has deliberately given false evidence to mislead the court; it
should not be applied in instances where the court should only disregard the
witness' evidence as untrue.
2. In this case, the High Court judge disbelieved the evidence of the appellant.
Her evidence does not meet the higher degree of deliberate falsehood amounting
to perjury.
Cases referred to:
1. Attorney Gener
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.