SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

PRASANTH AND ANOTHER VS. DEVARAJAN AND ANOTHER


PRASANTH AND ANOTHER

PRASANTH AND ANOTHER

Vs.

DEVARAJAN AND ANOTHER

SUPREME COURT
ALUWIHARE, J.
WENGAPPULI, J.
SAMAYAWARDHENA, J.
SC/APPEAL/163/2019
SC/HCCA/LA/327/2019
WP/HCCA/COL/131/2015 (F)
DC COLOMBO DLM/00041/2013
FEBRUARY 17, 2021

Vindicatory action-Burden of proof-Adversarial and inquisitorial systems-"Subject to proof" objection-Permissive possession- Adverse possession-Prescription

The plaintiffs filed action in the District Court seeking a declaration of title to the property in suit and ejectment of the defendants therefrom. The defendants sought the dismissal of the plaintiffs' action and claimed prescriptive title to the property. The District Court held with the plaintiffs and on appeal the High Court held with the defendants. The plaintiffs appealed to the Supreme Court.

Held:

1. In a vindicatory action, the initial burden is on the plaintiff to prove title to the property. However, once the paper title to the property is accepted by the defendant or proved by the plaintiff, the burden shifts to the defendant to prove on what right he is in possession of the property.

2. The right to possession and the right to recover possession are essent































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top