SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

SENEVIRATNE – Appellant
Versus
DIRECTOR GENERAL OF THE COMMISSION TO INVESTIGATE ALLEGATIONS OF BRIBERY OR CORRUPTION – Respondent


SENEVIRATNE

SENEVIRATNE

Vs.

DIRECTOR GENERAL OF THE COMMISSION TO INVESTIGATE ALLEGATIONS OF BRIBERY OR CORRUPTION

SUPREME COURT
PERERA, C.J.
DEHIDENIYA, J.
M.N.B. FERNANDO, J.
SC/APPEAL/19/2013
HC COLOMBO 119/2017
MC COLOMBO 29621/5
SEPTEMBER 28, 2018

Bribery Act, No. 11 of 1954, section 19(c)-ldentification of accused-Conviction based on uncertified copies of identification parade notes-Belated dock identification by complainant

The appellant was a forest officer attached to the Southern Provincial Office of the Forest Department. He was charged in the Magistrate's Court of Colombo by the Commission to Investigate Allegations of Bribery or Corruption (CIABOC) for the offences of soliciting and accepting a gratification of Rs. 2,000 from the complainant at Gintota, which were both offences under section 19(c) of the Bribery Act, No. 11 of 1954, as amended. The alleged incident had taken place on 06.08.1996 when a lorry containing timber that was being transported by the complainant, was stopped by members of the flying squad of the Forest Department. At an identification parade held in November 1996 in the Magistrate's Court of Galle, the appellant had been






















































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top