SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

GOTABHAYA RAJAPAKSE VS. ATTORNEY GENERAL AND OTHERS


GOTABHAYARAJAPAKSE

GOTABHAYA RAJAPAKSE

Vs.

ATTORNEY GENERAL AND OTHERS

COURT OF APPEAL
WENGAPPULI, J.
OBEYSEKERE, J.
CA/PHC/25/2019
HC COLOMBO HC/PTB/02/2018
JUNE 7 AND 14, 2019

Revision-Appellate jurisdiction over the Permanent High Court at Bar- Judicature (Amendment) Act No. 9 of 2018, sections 12A(1)(a), 128(1)-Article 138 of the Constitution

The petitioner was indicted before the Permanent High Court at Bar established under section 12A(1)(a) of the Judicature (Amendment) Act No. 9 of 2018. He raised a jurisdictional objection in the first instance and the Permanent High Court at Bar overruled the said objection. The petitioner filed a revision application before the Court of Appeal seeking to revise the said order and interim relief. The respondent raised a preliminary objection stating that the Court of Appeal cannot exercise appellate jurisdiction including in revision in respect of decisions of the Permanent High Court at Bar, as the appellate jurisdiction has been vested with the Supreme Court.

Held:

1. The term 'High Court' in Article 138 appears to not include the High Court of the Provinces established under Article 154P when it exercises original






















































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top