SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

NAZEER AND ANOTHER VS. WIJEWEERA AND ANOTHER


NAZEER AND ANOTHER

NAZEER AND ANOTHER

Vs.

WIJEWEERA AND ANOTHER

COURT OF APPEAL
J. DE SILVA, J.
KARUNARATHNA, J.
CA/WRIT /83/2014
MAY 9, 2019

Writs of certiorari and mandamus-Customs Ordinance, sections 8(1), 12, 43, 107A (1)-lmport and Export Control Act, No. 1 of 1969- Exchange Control Act-Admission of guilt-Action for declaration of title-Alternative Remedy

The 1st petitioner was intercepted by customs on his arrival in Colombo and 10 gold slabs valued at Rs. 5 million were found in his possession

in contravention of sections 12, 43, 107A(1) of the Customs Ordinance read with the Import and Export Control Act. A customs inquiry was held in terms of section 8(1) of the Customs Ordinance by the 2nd respondent on the same day and the 1st petitioner was represented by an attorney-at-law who pleaded guilty to the charges. The 2nd respondent inter alia declared the forfeiture of the gold. The petitioner filed this application before the Court of Appeal seeking a writ of certiorari quashing the said order and a writ of mandamus compelling the respondents to release the gold to the petitioner.

Held:

1. An admission of fact made by counsel is binding on the client



































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top