THYAGARATNE VS. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF AGRARIAN DEVELOPMENT AND ANOTHER
THYAGARATNE
Vs.
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF AGRARIAN DEVELOPMENT AND ANOTHER
COURT OF APPEAL
WICKREMASINGHE, J.
SAMAYAWARDHENA, J.
CA (PHC) 188/2013
HC KALUTARA 55/2011/REV
MC KALUTARA 84601
Agrarian Development Act, No. 46 of 2000, sections 28, 33(1), 33(3),
33(4), 33(5), 33(7), 33(8), 101-Restraining order-Filling of paddy lands-Scope
of the inquiry before the Magistrate's Court-Defences
The Commissioner General of Agrarian Development instituted proceedings against
the appellant in the Magistrate's Court under section
33(3) of the Agrarian Development Act, No. 46 of 2000, as amended, praying for
the issue of an order restraining the appellant from filling the paddy land. The
appellant took up the position that (a) the subject land is not a paddy land and
(b) he never filled the land, and therefore the application is misconceived in
law. After inquiry, the Magistrate's Court issued the restraining order. The
revision application filed against this order was dismissed by the High Court.
The appellant appealed to the Court of Appeal.
Held:
1. The appellant cannot take up new defences
which are questions law for the first time in appeal. The identificati
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.