RANASINGHE AND ANOTHER VS. CEYLON PETROLEUM STORAGE TERMINALS LTD AND OTHERS
RANASINGHE AND ANOTHER
Vs.
CEYLON PETROLEUM STORAGE TERMINALS LTD AND OTHERS
SUPREME COURT
ALUWIHARE, J.
DEHIDENIYA, J.
FERNANDO, J.
SC/FR/244/2017
JUNE 13, 2018
Fundamental rights-Article 126(2) of the Constitution-Time bar-Human Rights
Commission of Sri Lanka Act, No. 21 of 1996, section
13(1)-Burden of proof
The petitioners alleged that their fundamental rights had been infringed by the
respondents' failure to grant the promotions that the petitioners claimed they
were duly entitled to. When the matter was taken up for support, a preliminary
objection was raised by the respondents that the application had been filed four
months and eight days after the alleged violation, and hence was time barred in
terms of Articles 17 and 126 of the Constitution. The petitioners' position was
that they had filed a
complaint with the Human Rights Commission of Sri Lanka (HRC) prior to coming
before the Supreme Court, and that in view of section 13(1) of the Human Rights
Commission of Sri Lanka Act, No. 21 of 1996, time freezes and therefore the
application was not time barred. The petitioners also alleged that up to date
there had been no formal notifi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.