RAJAPAKSHA – Appellant
Versus
RATHNAYAKE & TEN OTHERS – Respondent
RAJAPAKSHA
VS
RATHNAYAKE & TEN OTHERS
SUPREME COURT,
EVA WANASUNDERA, PC, J.
ALUWIHARE, PC, J.
SISIRA DE ABREW J.
SC FR 689/2012.
DECEMBER 08, 2015.
Fundamental Rights -Article 126 of the Constitution-Article 11,12,13(1) and 13(2) - Arrested - false case - physical and mental trauma - Producing a suspect on fabricated charges before a Magistrate - Is it cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment? Equal protection of the law -Evidence Ordinance Section 134 - Principles laid down.
The petitioner sought a declaration to the effect that his fundamental rights guaranteed under Article 11 have been violated by the 1st -6th Respondents, violations under Article 13(1) and 13(2) against 1st Respondent and Article 12 against 7th to 9th Respondents.
HELD:
[1] If a person is arrested and kept in the Police remand cell without any reasons and later a false case is fabricated against him, his personal liberty is restricted and such a person undergoes physical and mental trauma. In such a situation it can be concluded that he was subjected to torture, cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment and punishment.
[2] When a person is arrested without re
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.