SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

HBS MOTORS (PVT) LTD – Appellant
Versus
HEENKENDA – Respondent


HBS MOTORS (PVT) LTD

HBS MOTORS (PVT) LTD
Vs.
HEENKENDA

SUPREME COURT
B.ALUWIHARE P.C..J.
A.GOONERATNE J.
H.N.G.PERERA J.
SC APPEAL NO. 100/15
SC SPL. LA HC 254/14
HIGH COURT NO. 96/2014/ PC/ HCCA/ KY/RA
KANDY LT NO. LT/88/2013
23.06.2016

The Industrial Disputes Act - Industrial Disputes Special Provisions Act, No. 13 of 2013-Company's Act, No. 7 of 2007. Who could represent a Company when an Attorney at Law appears for the Company-Locus Standi-Revision -Section 3 of the Industrial Disputes Act - Revision - Shocks conscience of court - When should court exercise such powers- Natural person - legal person - Juristic person.

The Applicant- Respondent being an employee of the Employer filed an application in the Labour Tribunal urging unjust termination of employment. Labour Tribunal commenced the inquiry on 22.01.2014. The employer as well as the employee were represented by their respective Attorneys-at- Law. On 02.10.2014 an Attorney- at- Law appeared for the employer and one Wipularatne Banda (Respondent- Respondent to the instant application) represented the employee. Objection raised by Attorney- at- Law for Applicant that the said Wipularatne Banda was not a pr






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top