HBS MOTORS (PVT) LTD – Appellant
Versus
HEENKENDA – Respondent
HBS MOTORS (PVT) LTD
Vs.
HEENKENDA
SUPREME COURT
B.ALUWIHARE P.C..J.
A.GOONERATNE J.
H.N.G.PERERA J.
SC APPEAL NO. 100/15
SC SPL. LA HC 254/14
HIGH COURT NO. 96/2014/ PC/ HCCA/ KY/RA
KANDY LT NO. LT/88/2013
23.06.2016
The Industrial Disputes Act - Industrial Disputes Special Provisions Act, No. 13 of 2013-Company's Act, No. 7 of 2007. Who could represent a Company when an Attorney at Law appears for the Company-Locus Standi-Revision -Section 3 of the Industrial Disputes Act - Revision - Shocks conscience of court - When should court exercise such powers- Natural person - legal person - Juristic person.
The Applicant- Respondent being an employee of the Employer filed an application in the Labour Tribunal urging unjust termination of employment. Labour Tribunal commenced the inquiry on 22.01.2014. The employer as well as the employee were represented by their respective Attorneys-at- Law. On 02.10.2014 an Attorney- at- Law appeared for the employer and one Wipularatne Banda (Respondent- Respondent to the instant application) represented the employee. Objection raised by Attorney- at- Law for Applicant that the said Wipularatne Banda was not a pr
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.