DHARSHANA WERADUWAGE VS. 1. HON. ATTORNEY GENERAL 2. HON. RANIL WICKREMESINGHE
DHARSHANA WERADUWAGE
VS.
1. HON. ATTORNEY GENERAL
2. HON. RANIL WICKREMESINGHE
SUPREME COURT
B.P.ALUWIHARE.PC.J.
UPALY ABERATHNE.J.
K.T.CHITRASIRI.J.
SC FR 233/16
04.10.2016
Parliamentary privileges- Leave to appeal- Support- Article 12(1) and 14(g)-Preliminary Objection-Jurisdiction of Supreme Court- Parliament (Powers and Privileges Act)
This was a leave to appeal
application. On the date of support a preliminary objection was raised as
regards the maintainability of the application.
Complaint of Petitioners is regarding a statement made by the Hon. Prime
Minister in response to a statement made by a member of Parliament in the course
of parliamentary proceedings. Counsel for the respondent contended that the
Supreme Court would not have Jurisdiction to delve into the issues raised by the
Petitioners in view of Constitutional provisions that ousts the Jurisdiction.
HELD:
1. A plain reading of this
constitutional provision referred to above, has no ambiguity whatsoever and
the provision simply states that the judicial power of the people is to be
exercised by Parliament with regard to matters relating to privileges,
immunities and powers of Parliament.
In
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.