SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

BANDAGE SUMINDRA JAYANTHI vs. ATTORNEY GENERAL


BANDAGE SUMINDRA JAYANTHI

BANDAGE SUMINDRA JAYANTHI
vs.
ATTORNEY GENERAL

COURT OF APPEAL
H.N.J. PERERA, J.
A.H.M.D. NAWAZ., J.
CA 251/12 - 267/12
HIGH COURT VAVUNIYA
APRIL 2, 2015

Penal Code Section 386 - Offences against the Public Property Act No. 12 of 1982 amended by Act, No. 76 of 1988 Section 5(1) - Criminal misappropriation - 14 indictments against accused appellant - Code of Criminal Procedure Act - Section 13, Section 16, Section 197, Section 167 (1) Section 121 Section 300, Section 303 - Misappropriated funds deposited in court - Duty of the prosecuting counsel - Judicature Act 2 of 1978 Section 14 (b) - Sentencing policy - Accused Pleading guilty - Appeal lies? - Article 138 of the Constitution - Administration of Justice Law - Section 236 (b) - Concurrent -  Consecutive Sentences - Evidence Ordinance Section 58.

In the 14 indictments filed against the Accused Appellant- each Indictment - had distinct counts charging the Accused with Criminal misappropriation under Section 386 Penal Code read with Section 5(1) of Offences against the Public Property Act - When the Accused indicated that she had deposited the misappropriated money, the offences against the












































































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top