SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

COMMANDER OF THE AIR FORCE AND OTHERS VS. BANDARA


COMMANDER OF THE AIR FORCE AND OTHERS VS. BANDARA

COMMANDER OF THE AIR FORCE AND OTHERS
VS.
BANDARA

COURT OF APPEAL
SUPREME COURT
CHANDRA EKANAYAKE, J
PRIYASATH DEP, PC. J
EVA WANASUNDARA, PC, J
SC 104/2008
CA 414/2005
MAY 22, 2014
MAY 30, 2014

Writ of Certiorari - Air Force Act, Section 40, 42, 43, 102(1), 133 - Officer Cadet - Provisions of the Air Force Act - Do they apply to a Cadet Officer - Discharge from service consequent to a Summary Trial - Charges under Section 102(1) and Section 129 of the Air Force Act - Should the suspect be tried by a Court Martial? - Can a person be discharged from service consequent to a Summary Trial - No person could be punished twice over?

A complaint was made against the Cadet officer - Respondent - that he and another entered into the Residential Quarters of another officer -under Section 104, Section 129 of the Air Force Act - And for violating base standing orders and committing Criminal Trespass. At a Summary Inquiry held he was found guilty of the two charges and was imposed 30 days detention on Charge 1 and 14 days detention on Charge 2. Later he was exonerated on Charge 1 and the sentence of the 2nd Charge was carrie


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top