FERNANDO VS. PERERA
FERNANDO VS. PERERA
SUPREME COURT
TILAKAWARDANE J.
DEP P.C.J.
EVA WANASUNDERA PC. J.
SC APPEAL 80/2010
SC HCCALA 261/09
WP/HCCA KAL-106/02 (F)
DC PANADURA 341/RE
JUNE 17, 2013
Rent Act No. 7 of 1972- Section 22 (1) [d] Deterioration?- What is structural
alteration-Reparation of roof- improvement?- Decline value- Does it come within
deterioration - Duty of the tenant to take proper care- Expert Evidence.
The plaintiff-respondent sought the eviction of the tenant appellant from the
premises in question on the ground that the condition of the premises had become
deteriorated owing to acts committed by the appellant- Section 22(1) (d).
Judgment was entered in favour of the appellant in the District Court- the High
Court set aside the said judgment. The Supreme Court granted leave to appeal on
the issue whether the repairs made by the appellant tenant caused deterioration
to the premises and whether replacement of Sinhala tiles with asbestos sheets
caused deterioration of the premises.
Held:
(1) Expert evidence is a fundamental necessity upon which the question of
whether the repairs amount to deterioration or improvement remains.
(2) The
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.