SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

PROF. DHARMARATNE AND OTHERS VS. INSTITUTE OF FUNDAMENTAL STUDIES AND OTHERS


PROF. DHARMARATNE

PROF. DHARMARATNE AND OTHERS VS. INSTITUTE OF
FUNDAMENTAL STUDIES AND OTHERS

SUPREME COURT
SALEEM MARSOOF, PC. J
RATNAYAKE, P.C., J AND
IMAM,J.
SCFR APPLICATION NO. 73/2007
SC FR APPLICATION NO. 371/2009
SC FR APPLICATION NO. 413/2009
FEBRUARY 15TH, 2011

Article 126 (1) of the Constitution - Fundamental rights jurisdiction and its exercise - Supreme Court shall have sole and exclusive jurisdiction to hear and determine any question relating to the infringement or imminent infringement, by executive or administrative action of any fundamental right or language right declared and recognized by Chapter III or Chapter IV - Application of the 'tests'

The main question for determination in all three applications is whether the Institute of Fundamental Studies (IFS) is a body which exercises executive or administrative functions within the meaning of Article 126 of the Constitution, and hence whether the impugned actions of the IFS may be subjected to judicial review in terms of Article 126 of the Constitution.

Held:

1. Our Courts have applied various tests to determine whether a particular person, Institution or other body whose action is alleged



















































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top