SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ARIYADASA V ATTORNEY GENERAL


ARIYADASA

ARIYADASA
V
ATTORNEY GENERAL
 

COURT OF APPEAL
RANJITH SILVA, J
SISIRA DE ABREW, J
CA 14212003
HC MATARA 143/96
SEPTEMBER 12, 13, 14, 2007

Penal Code - Section 294 - Section 296 - Section 315 - Eye witness not a credible witness ? - Disturbing a finding with regard to acceptance or rejection of a testimony of a witness ? - Section 294 Ingredients ? - Dock statement - 'Approach in evaluating? - Constitution Article 138 - Criminal Procedure Code Section 334.

The accused - appellant was convicted, of murder and sentenced to death he was also convicted of causing hurt to one K and sentenced to 6 months rigorous imprisonment.

It was contended that, the eye witness was not a credible witness, and that Injury No. I was not caused by the accused - appellant and further that the other 12 cut injuries have not caused the death of the deceased. It was further contended that the reason given by trial Judge in rejecting the dock statement  was erroneous.

Held:

(1) Court of Appeal will not lightly disturb a finding of a Judge with regard to the acceptance or rejection of a testimony of a witness , unless It is manifestly wrong, when the trial Judge has ta











































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top