STEVEN APPUHAMY V. DOTTY
STEVEN APPUHAMY
V.
DOTTY
COURT OF APPEAL
SRISKANDARAJAH.J.
UPALY ABEYRATHNE.J.
CA 631/99(F)
DC GAMPAHA 33489/L
Minor-Execution of Deed - Contract of minors - Prescription - 3 years - Fraud
alleged - When does prescription commence to run against a minor? -Cause of
action? - Unassisted contracts?
The plaintiff - respondent instituted action seeking an order to invalidate the
transfer deed, denying her execution of the deed alleged that she was 17 years
old at the time of attestation of the alleged deed of transfer
The defendant - appellant contended that the deed has been duly registered and
the respondent's action is prescribed in law. The District Court held with the
plaintiff.
HELD:
(1) Under the existing law, failure by a minor within three years of the
attainment of majority to institute action for the avoidance of his contract
would debar him from seeking this relief thereafter.
(2) When elements of fraud exist where such circumstances are not within the
knowledge of the minor who obtained majority, then the cause of action would
accrue to the minor within three years from the time he came to know about the
alleged fraudulent act.
Per Upa
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.