SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

GOMEZ VS. STATE


GOMEZ

GOMEZ
VS.
STATE

COURT OF APPEAL
SISIRA DEABREW, J.
UPALY ABEYRATNE, J.
CA 168/2004
HC COLOMBO 1036/2002
10TH NOVEMBER, 2008

Penal Code - Section 310, Section 313, Section 316 - Voluntarily causing grievous hurt- Ingredients- two distinct elements- Factum and animus-Absence of direct evidence of intent-Presumption?- Extent.

The accused - appellant was indicted under Section 316 of the Penal Code for voluntarily causing grievous hurt, to one R. After trial he was found guilty and sentenced. On appeal,

Held:

(1) Section 311 Penal Code - sets out the kinds of hurt which fell within the definition of grievous hurt - the requirements for the completion of the offence are in Section 313 - Penal Code. In terms of Section 313 -whoever voluntarily causes hurt, if the hurt which he intends to cause or knows himself to be likely to cause is grievous hurt, and if the hurt which he causes is grievous hurt is said voluntarily to cause grievous hurt.

(2) Offence of voluntarily causing grievous hurt consists of two distinct elements - factum and animus.

The prosecution must prove that the appellant did cause hurt, which hurt fell within the meaning of one of the limbs of





















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top