SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

RANNAIDE VS. WIMALASOORIYA AND OTHERS (IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR RELISTING OF THE APPEAL)


RANNAIDE

RANNAIDE
VS.
WIMALASOORIYA AND OTHERS (IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR RELISTING OF THE APPEAL)

COURT OF APPEAL
CHANDRA EKANAYAKE, J
SRI SKANDARAJAH, J
W.L.R. DE SILVA, J
CA 1015/1993 (F) (DB)
DC KURUNEGALA 267/L

Rei Vindicatio action - Judgment delivered in the Court of Appeal - Substitution - With the death of a party does the record become defective?- When the appellant

is dead-ls the judgment delivered bad in law- Should the case be relisted? What is nullity? Inherent powers of Court - Nunc protunc - Judgment absolute nullity­Could be redelivered - Coram Non Judice

The judgment was pronounced by the Court of Appeal on 13.01.2004. Parties were represented by Counsel - and it had not been brought to the notice of Court about the death of the original 1st plaintiff - appellant The petitioner on 24.03.2004 sought to substitute him In the room of the deceased 1st plaintiff­ appellant and the judgment delivered be pro forma set aside and the same judgment be re-delivered, as the bench was divided in their views a Divisional Bench was constituted and the matter was argued before the Divisional Bench - as order for substitution was made - arguments wer























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top