SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

PIYASENA VS. ILANKAI THAMIL ARASU KADCHI AND OTHERS


PIYASENA

PIYASENA
VS.
ILANKAI THAMIL ARASU KADCHI AND OTHERS

SUPREME COURT
SALEEM MARSOOF, P. C. J.
SRIPAVAN, J.AND
SURESH CHANDRA, J.
S.C.APPLICATION (SPECIAL) EXPULSION NO. 03/2010
JANUARY 18TH, 2011
JANUARY 24TH, 2011
JANUARY 25TH, 2011

Expulsion of a Member from a recognised political party - Constitution - Article 99 (13) (a) - Validity of expulsion - Injunctive and discretionary relief- Duty of full disclosure of all material facts - Provincial Councils Act 2 of 1988.

The Petitioner was elected to the Parliament as a member of the political party, "Ilankai Thamil Arasu Kadchi" (ITAK). He was expelled from the said party on a decision taken by the Disciplinary Committee of the ITAK. The Petitioner prayed for a declaration that the said decision to expel him from the ITAK as
communicated by 'P 12' is invalid and of no force or avail in law and for a determination that the said expulsion was invalid. He also prayed for a declaration that the Petitioner has not ceased to be a Member of Parliament and that he continues to be and remains a Member of Parliament.

A preliminary objection was taken at the outset to the maintainability of the application on the
































































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top