PIYASENA VS. ILANKAI THAMIL ARASU KADCHI AND OTHERS
PIYASENA
VS.
ILANKAI THAMIL ARASU KADCHI AND OTHERS
SUPREME COURT
SALEEM MARSOOF, P. C. J.
SRIPAVAN, J.AND
SURESH CHANDRA, J.
S.C.APPLICATION (SPECIAL) EXPULSION NO. 03/2010
JANUARY 18TH, 2011
JANUARY 24TH, 2011
JANUARY 25TH, 2011
Expulsion of a Member from a recognised political party - Constitution - Article
99 (13) (a) - Validity of expulsion - Injunctive and discretionary relief- Duty
of full disclosure of all material facts - Provincial Councils Act 2 of 1988.
The Petitioner was elected to the Parliament as a member of the political party,
"Ilankai Thamil Arasu Kadchi" (ITAK). He was expelled from the said party on a
decision taken by the Disciplinary Committee of the ITAK. The Petitioner prayed
for a declaration that the said decision to expel him from the ITAK as
communicated by 'P 12' is invalid and of no force or avail in law and for a
determination that the said expulsion was invalid. He also prayed for a
declaration that the Petitioner has not ceased to be a Member of Parliament and
that he continues to be and remains a Member of Parliament.
A preliminary objection was taken at the outset to the maintainability of the
application on the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.