SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

WEERASURIYA – Appellant
Versus
PERERA – Respondent


WEERASURIYA VS PERERA

WEERASURIYA
VS
PERERA

COURT OF APPEAL
BASNAYAKE, J.
CHITRASIRI, J.
CA LA 384/2005 (LG),
DC KANDY 62/2004 MS
JUNE 22, 2009.


Civil Procedure Code Chapter LIII - Summary Procedure on liquid claims -Section 703, 704, 706 - Sustainable Defense - Prima facie case - Standard of proof?

The Plaintiff filed action in terms of chapter LIII of the Code - The Defendant sought to file answer without a condition being imposed The Trial Judge refused the said application and directed the Defendant to deposit Rs. 800,000/- as security. The Defendant sought leave to appeal - with leave being granted.

Held:

(1) If the defense taken up by the Defendant is prima facie sustainable then the Court should allow the Defendant to participate in the proceedings unconditionally or if the defense is not prima facie sustainable if the Court feels that there exists a reasonable doubt as to the good faith of such a defence - Court should order him/her to pay into Court the sum mentioned in the summons as security and allow the Defendant to participate.

Per Chitrasiri, J.

"The Learned District Judge should not have expected the Defendant to establish a defence which is c


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top